Operational covenant · Updated June 2026

Insurance maintenance

An insurance maintenance covenant requires the borrower to maintain specified insurance coverage (property, liability, business interruption, key person) with the lender named as additional insured.

By Credia · 13 min read · EN · NL · FR

Every Belgian SME founder knows they need insurance. What very few of them understand is what happens the moment the bank is named as loss payee on their fire policy. In a total loss event — a factory destroyed, a warehouse gutted — the insurer does not pay the business owner. It pays the bank first, directly, in full, up to the outstanding loan balance. The business is left to rebuild without those proceeds, with its bank debt intact and its working capital untouched by the payout it had been counting on. This clause gets signed on page fourteen of a credit agreement without being read. This article makes it readable.

The insurance maintenance covenant is one of the most operational obligations in a Belgian SME credit agreement. Unlike a financial covenant — which tests a ratio on a test date — an insurance covenant is a continuous, daily obligation. You are required to maintain specific types of coverage, at specified minimum amounts, with the bank named in a specific legal capacity, at all times for the life of the facility. A lapse in coverage, even for a week between policy renewals, can constitute a technical event of default. Most SME founders discover the implications only when they try to switch insurer, or when their broker asks whether the bank has any requirements.

This article covers how Belgian banks structure insurance obligations in credit agreements, why the loss payee versus additional insured distinction matters enormously in practice, what coverage thresholds you should expect, and where you have room to negotiate. It connects to the broader collateral picture covered in collateral maintenance, and to the reporting requirement covenant that typically requires you to deliver annual insurance certificates to your bank.

What Is an Insurance Maintenance Covenant?

An insurance maintenance covenant is a contractual obligation requiring the borrower to hold specified types of insurance coverage at agreed minimum levels for the duration of the credit facility. It appears in the 'Undertakings' or 'General Obligations' section of Belgian credit agreements, typically alongside other operational covenants such as the obligation to maintain assets in good repair and to notify the bank of material adverse changes. Unlike financial covenants, which are tested periodically, the insurance covenant operates continuously: you are in breach the moment coverage lapses, not at the next test date.

The covenant will specify, at minimum, the categories of insurance required (fire and property, business interruption, third-party liability), the minimum sum insured for each category, and the bank's designated status under each policy. It will also usually require that you promptly notify the bank of any claim above a specified threshold, typically €25,000 to €50,000 in Belgian practice, and that you do not settle a material claim without the bank's consent. Some agreements go further, requiring that the bank's written approval be obtained before switching insurer or amending policy terms in any material respect.

The covenant exists because the bank's exposure to your business is, in part, an exposure to the physical and operational assets that underpin your ability to repay. If your warehouse burns down and you have no business interruption insurance, your revenue stops — but your debt repayment schedule does not. The insurance maintenance covenant is the bank's way of ensuring that the financial structure surrounding your assets does not disappear because of an event that the insurance market could have absorbed. It is less a protection for you than a protection for the bank's claim on your cash flow.

Why Banks Require Insurance Covenants

Belgian banks lend against the future cash flows of a business, not primarily against its assets. But the assets are the productive base from which those cash flows are generated. A machine that burns down is a machine that no longer generates revenue. Business premises destroyed by fire or flood remove the physical infrastructure on which your operations depend. Without insurance, the destruction of a key asset converts a performing loan into a distressed one almost overnight. The insurance covenant is the mechanism by which the bank ensures that the financial cushion — the insurance policy — remains in place and enforceable throughout the life of the facility.

Banks also lend with an eye on their regulatory obligations. EBA loan origination guidelines (EBA/GL/2020/06), which Belgian banks apply under NBB supervisory oversight, require that credit institutions assess the adequacy of borrower-side risk mitigation arrangements at origination and monitor them on an ongoing basis. Insurance maintenance covenants are part of that risk mitigation framework. When the bank's credit committee approves a facility, the assumption that the borrower carries adequate coverage is baked into the risk rating. A lapse in coverage — particularly for property or business interruption — changes the risk profile of the loan in ways the credit committee never anticipated.

There is also a direct connection to collateral maintenance. In the majority of Belgian SME investment credit agreements, the bank takes a pledge (hypothèque / hypotheek) over the financed property or equipment, or a business pledge (gage sur fonds de commerce / pand op handelszaak) over the enterprise as a whole. The insurance policy, with the bank named as beneficiary, is the financial instrument that preserves the value of that pledge in a loss event. Without it, the collateral can be destroyed and the bank is left with an unsecured claim against a business whose productive assets no longer exist.

Loss Payee Versus Additional Insured: Who Gets the Money

This is the distinction most Belgian SME founders do not understand until it is too late to renegotiate. Loss payee (begunstigde bij schade / bénéficiaire en cas de sinistre) means that in the event of a covered loss, the insurance proceeds flow directly to the bank, not to the business, up to the outstanding loan balance. The bank is literally the first recipient of the cheque. The business owner gets what remains after the bank has been made whole. If the outstanding loan exceeds the insured value of the destroyed asset, the business owner gets nothing and is still indebted for any shortfall. Loss payee is the more aggressive formulation, and it is the one you are most likely to see in a first-draft Belgian credit agreement.

Additional insured (medeverzekerde / co-assuré) is a meaningfully different concept. It grants the bank independent rights under the policy — the bank can make claims, receive notices, and enforce coverage in its own right — but it does not automatically redirect proceeds to the bank first. In a loss event, the proceeds still go to the policyholder (the business), and the bank's leverage is its contractual right to be consulted in the settlement process, not to intercept the payment. Additional insured status is the more balanced formulation and warrants a push during negotiation.

In Belgian practice, banks and borrowers sometimes agree on a hybrid: the business is the primary recipient of insurance proceeds below a threshold (say, €100,000), while larger claims are subject to the bank's prior approval for settlement and direction of proceeds. This is pragmatic: it allows the business to handle routine claims efficiently while preserving the bank's oversight for major loss events that directly affect the security value. If your term sheet uses loss payee language without qualification, raise it before signing. The legal distinction between these two formulations has real economic consequences in a total loss scenario, and it is far easier to negotiate pre-signing than to renegotiate mid-facility.

Push for 'additional insured' rather than 'loss payee' wording in your credit agreement. In a total loss event, the difference between these two formulations determines whether the insurance proceeds rebuild your business or repay your bank.

Typical Coverage Requirements in Belgian SME Lending

Belgian banks universally require brandverzekering / assurance incendie (fire and property insurance) at a minimum. The coverage amount is typically set at replacement cost (herbouwwaarde / valeur de reconstruction), not market value. This distinction matters particularly for older industrial premises, where market value may be substantially below the actual cost of rebuilding to current specifications. A warehouse built in 1985 and carried on the balance sheet at €400,000 may cost €750,000 to rebuild at current construction prices and to current building code standards. If you insure only to market value, the gap — sometimes called sous-assurance in Belgian insurance practice — leaves you exposed, and some Belgian lenders now require the insured value to be verified by an independent surveyor at origination.

Business interruption insurance (bedrijfsonderbrekingsverzekering / assurance perte d'exploitation) is required in the majority of Belgian investment credit agreements for operating businesses. The standard market requirement is coverage for a minimum of 12 months of gross margin, with 24 months increasingly required for larger facilities or businesses with long recovery timelines — a food processing company that needs 18 months to rebuild its production line to regulatory compliance is the canonical example. Belgian banks, including KBC, BNP Paribas Fortis, Belfius, and ING Belgium, treat business interruption coverage as a direct proxy for your ability to continue servicing debt during a reconstruction period: without it, the bank faces revenue interruption risk that no property payout resolves.

Professional liability insurance (beroepsaansprakelijkheidsverzekering / assurance responsabilité professionnelle) is commonly required for service businesses — architects, engineers, consultants, IT firms — and sometimes for manufacturing SMEs whose products carry product liability exposure. Third-party civil liability (burgerlijke aansprakelijkheid / responsabilité civile) is a near-universal baseline requirement. Key person insurance is a separate instrument that sometimes appears in the same covenant package, covering the death or permanent incapacity of a founder or essential manager; it is addressed separately in key person clause.

What to Watch After Signing

The most common insurance covenant breach in Belgian SME lending is not a deliberate decision to cancel coverage. It is a lapse during policy renewal. Annual insurance policies expire on a fixed date. If your renewal is delayed — because your broker is slow, because you are switching insurer, because a premium dispute with the existing insurer is unresolved — you may have a window of days or weeks where no valid policy is in force. That window is a technical event of default under your credit agreement, even if you are not aware of it. The practical solution is to track your policy expiry dates independently of your broker and to notify your bank relationship manager proactively if any renewal is delayed. Most Belgian banks will treat a short-gap situation sympathetically if they are informed before the gap occurs, not after.

Banks also audit insurance compliance, typically through the reporting requirement covenant, which will usually oblige you to deliver a certificate of insurance — signed by your broker and confirming coverage types, amounts, and the bank's named status — within a specified period after each annual policy renewal. Typically this is 30 to 60 days post-renewal in Belgian practice. Failing to deliver the certificate on time is itself a breach — not of the insurance covenant, but of the reporting covenant — and it will trigger a letter from the bank requesting remediation. Keep a tickler in your calendar for the certificate delivery deadline, and brief your broker at the start of each year on the bank's specific requirements.

A subtler risk arises when you increase the value of insured assets — new equipment, a property extension — without updating your coverage. If your insurance policy was set at the values in place at loan origination and your asset base has grown materially, the under-insurance gap means that in a total loss event the proceeds may not cover the bank's outstanding claim. Some credit agreements include an obligation to notify the bank of material additions to fixed assets and to adjust coverage accordingly. Even where this obligation is not explicit, maintaining adequate coverage in proportion to asset values is both good insurance practice and consistent with the spirit of the covenant.

How to Negotiate the Insurance Maintenance Covenant

The most important negotiation is over the bank's named status in each policy. As set out above, pushing for 'additional insured' rather than 'loss payee' wording preserves your access to insurance proceeds in a reconstruction scenario while still giving the bank the oversight it needs. Belgian competition law (Belgische Mededingingswetgeving / droit de la concurrence belge) explicitly prohibits the obligatory tying of insurance to credit — you have the legal right to choose your insurer regardless of which bank you borrow from. Some KBC credit facilities express a strong preference for coverage through KBC Insurance (part of the same bancassurance group), but this is a preference, not a legal requirement, and it should not be read as mandatory. BNP Paribas Fortis, Belfius, and ING Belgium require insurance but place no restriction on the borrower's choice of insurer.

On coverage thresholds, challenge any requirement that feels disproportionate to your actual risk profile. A 24-month business interruption requirement may be standard for a manufacturer with a two-year rebuild timeline, but it is excessive for a professional services firm that could resume operations in a rented office within weeks. Similarly, if your credit agreement requires replacement cost coverage for a property that you are about to demolish or redevelop, the replacement cost basis may be inapplicable, and a market value or reinstatement basis may be more appropriate. Bring your broker into the negotiation alongside your lawyer — a broker who understands banking requirements can often propose structures that satisfy the bank's risk concern at a lower premium cost for the business.

Finally, negotiate the materiality thresholds in the claim notification obligations. Many first-draft credit agreements require you to notify the bank of any insurance claim, regardless of size. This is operationally unworkable for a business with frequent small claims (a fleet of vehicles, recurring equipment damage). Push for a notification threshold — €25,000 to €50,000 is typical in negotiated Belgian agreements — below which you may settle claims without the bank's involvement. This preserves the bank's oversight on material events while freeing you from an administrative obligation that adds no risk-management value. The insurance covenant sits within a broader covenant framework: reviewing it in conjunction with your collateral maintenance obligations will give you a complete picture of what the bank is protecting and where the negotiation priorities lie.

The fastest way to see whether a Insurance maintenance covenant — and every other condition — is in your term sheet is to let Credia read it for you. Upload the PDF and you get every covenant identified and explained, in plain language, in under two minutes.

Analyse your term sheet

New to term sheets? Read our term sheet guide.

Frequently asked questions

What is a Insurance maintenance covenant?

An insurance maintenance covenant requires the borrower to maintain specified insurance coverage (property, liability, business interruption, key person) with the lender named as additional insured.

What does a Insurance maintenance covenant restrict?

Creates ongoing insurance costs and administrative obligations. Lender may audit policies and claim insurance proceeds ahead of the borrower in certain events.

Can you negotiate a Insurance maintenance covenant?

Most covenant terms are negotiable at the term sheet stage, before the legal documentation is drawn up. With the Insurance maintenance covenant, focus on the definition, the threshold, the testing frequency, and the cure period. Ask your relationship manager what flexibility exists, and have your accountant confirm the level is one your business can hold comfortably. Read every line.

Which covenants are in your term sheet?

Upload your PDF. Credia identifies every covenant, in plain language, in under two minutes. Free.

Analyse your term sheet