On this page▾
You are working through your term sheet and you land on a clause that says something like: the lender may declare an event of default if a Material Adverse Change has occurred in the financial condition, business, or prospects of the borrower. You read it twice. The language is deliberately vague, and nowhere in the document does it tell you what would actually count as material. How bad does it have to get? A bad quarter? A lost client? That ambiguity is worth understanding before you sign.
What Is a MAC Clause?
A Material Adverse Change clause, also called a Material Adverse Effect or MAE clause, gives your bank the right to treat a significant deterioration in your business as a trigger event. Depending on where it appears, it either blocks a drawdown you have not yet received, or accelerates the entire loan as a formal event of default. Belgian banks almost exclusively use the Loan Market Association standard facility agreement as their template. The LMA definition covers three things: a material adverse effect on your business, financial condition, or prospects; a material adverse effect on your ability to meet your obligations; and a material adverse effect on the validity of the security the bank holds. Notice the word "prospects" in that first limb: it will come up again.
Why Your Bank Requires It
Financial covenants are backward-looking — they measure where your business has been, based on accounts that may be six to twelve months old. If something serious happens between measurement dates, a covenant-only structure leaves the bank with no immediate recourse. The MAC clause fills that gap: catch-all protection for circumstances that no one thought to write a specific number around. In practice it rarely functions as an enforcement weapon. Its real power is as a lever that gives the bank grounds to initiate a restructuring conversation without declaring a formal default.
What Counts as a Material Adverse Change
There is no statutory MAC definition under Belgian law. Unlike force majeure, this is a purely contractual concept, so what counts as material depends entirely on your agreement. Practitioners have a clear sense of the serious end: permanently losing a customer representing 25 to 30 percent of your revenue, filing for judicial reorganisation, regulatory revocation of a licence your business depends on, or a going concern qualification in your most recently filed audited accounts — note that an auditor's verbal concern raised during fieldwork does not carry the same weight as a qualification that appears in formally filed accounts. These are the events that make a KBC or Belfius credit officer pull out the loan file.
Events affecting your whole industry or the economy broadly are unlikely to qualify on their own. COVID-19 confirmed this. Belgian legal practitioners at Loyens & Loeff and Freshfields concluded in March 2020 that a systemic shock does not constitute a MAC for any specific borrower, because most MAC definitions require the adverse change to relate specifically to your situation — not just a proportionate share of a market-wide collapse. A temporary disruption with a visible recovery path also fails the threshold. The change must not be merely temporary.
How Belgian Banks Actually Use This Clause
Belgian banks did not invoke MAC clauses against SME borrowers during COVID-19. Not once in any documented case. The NBB's payment deferral charter, announced on 22 March 2020 with the federal government and Febelfin, and the EUR 50 billion loan guarantee scheme made MAC enforcement practically untenable. The restraint also reflected a legal reality: there is no Belgian case law sustaining a MAC enforcement in lending, and Belgian courts require a deterioration that is significant, material, and lasting — the same high bar set by the English courts that govern most LMA facilities.
In practice, ING Belgium, BNP Paribas Fortis, KBC, and Belfius prefer to address a deteriorating borrower through mechanisms that are more objective — a financial covenant breach with defined numbers, or a mandatory prepayment trigger. MAC gives the bank a reason to call you in. In most Belgian facilities, however, the bank must first issue a formal notice of MAC occurrence; the borrower then has a response or cure window before the loan formally accelerates as an Event of Default. That conversation is where the real work happens. Fulfilling your reporting requirement obligations promptly — submitting accounts and compliance certificates on time — limits the bank's practical appetite to invoke this clause, since regular reports give it real-time visibility into your position. A change of control that simultaneously constitutes an event of default under a separate clause may satisfy the MAC test as well, if the incoming ownership materially alters the business risk profile.
What to Watch
The standard of determination is the critical variable. If your agreement says a MAC occurs "in the opinion of the lender," the bank's internal credit assessment can trigger a very significant right. English courts confirm that even a subjective standard requires the lender's belief to be honest and rational, but that still leaves substantial room. Watch for the word "prospects," which lets the bank invoke the clause based on where it thinks you are headed rather than where you actually are. Watch also for notification obligations requiring you to flag events that could constitute a MAC: the reporting burden sits with you as borrower, not the bank, and failing to notify when you should have can itself constitute a separate breach under most Belgian facilities. Watch too for cross-default provisions that could spread a single bank's determination across your other loan agreements.
Where You Have Room to Negotiate
The most impactful change is to the standard of determination. Resist "in the sole discretion of the lender" or "in the opinion of the lender." Push instead for a "reasonable opinion" standard — the bank's determination is only valid if a reasonable lender in the same position would reach the same conclusion. Since 1 January 2023, the Belgian Civil Code (Book 5, Article 5.74) reinforces your position: clauses that create an obvious imbalance and were not properly negotiated can be challenged as unfair, and a MAC drafted as the bank's sole unreviewable discretion sits in uncomfortable territory under this framework. Document your negotiation requests and take legal advice; both steps strengthen your position. And push to remove "prospects" from the definition entirely: restricting the clause to actual, observable changes in your financial condition is a protection Belgian practitioners routinely advise borrowers to seek.
The fastest way to see whether a MAC clause covenant — and every other condition — is in your term sheet is to let Credia read it for you. Upload the PDF and you get every covenant identified and explained, in plain language, in under two minutes.
Analyse your term sheetNew to term sheets? Read our term sheet guide.
Frequently asked questions
What is a MAC clause covenant?
A Material Adverse Change (MAC) or Material Adverse Effect (MAE) clause allows the lender to call a default if a significant negative change occurs in the borrower’s financial condition, business, or prospects. The definition of “material” is typically broad and somewhat subjective.
What does a MAC clause covenant restrict?
Creates ongoing uncertainty — any significant negative event (loss of a major customer, regulatory change, market downturn) could theoretically trigger the clause. In practice, banks rarely invoke MAC in isolation, but it is a powerful negotiation tool in distressed situations.
Can you negotiate a MAC clause covenant?
Most covenant terms are negotiable at the term sheet stage, before the legal documentation is drawn up. With the MAC clause covenant, focus on the definition, the threshold, the testing frequency, and the cure period. Ask your relationship manager what flexibility exists, and have your accountant confirm the level is one your business can hold comfortably. Read every line.